The National Security Implications of Free 3D in a Browser

Jeffrey Carr sent a short broadcast via Twitter the other day: ”

New post on 3D imaging and Virtual Earth – mind blowing video http://bit.ly/3SxtdA

Jeffrey was blogging about a capability shown in the short clip below:

As you watch that, keep in mind that what you are seeing is a capability that can run on any PC that can run Internet Explorer (which is just about all of them). The clip shows a capability that Microsoft’s Caligari toolset “TrueSpace” has to build high resolution 3D models then upload them into Virtual Earth.

Currently national security planners, as well as others with mission needs for geospatial information, have many choices for solutions.  But most good solutions require loading specialized software on the workstation.  This includes, of course, Google Earth.   Google also provides 3D creation capabilities with Sketch-Up.  And that is a powerful combination.  But the need to load programs on workstations and move data to workstations complicates enterprise IT solutions.  Additionally, Google Earth is reportedly not accurate in elevation measurements.   Now the new capability shown in the YouTube clip indicates a solution that can give highly accurate 3D models to planners everywhere, and it can do that without having to instal large stand alone apps on workstations and without having to move large datasets to the workstation.

A use case:  Imagine a USMC team preparing for an evacuation of a group of citizens.  They shift into their Rapid Response Planning Process (R2P2) and move out.   Although this process ensures all available information is used and can accomodate information from external sources, the urgency of the mission means it will proceed no matter what.   No one involved is going to waste time trying to download new software programs or test applications or risk breaking systems that are working well.  New data is fine, but new software is not needed.   This 3D model that runs in a browser could be of tremendous use at times like this.  If the data is there, models can be presented to the planning team and they can visually walk through buildings before their mission.  The models can be provided from locations far away or from local data if available.  And they can be presented on any computer with a browser.

That is just one use case.  Many more can be brainstormed by planners, and I’d recommend this dialog get underway soon.  But there is actually another meta-point to make.   Consider the fact that this dialog can start much earlier in the process because of new web2.0 capabilities.  Thanks to Jeffrey’s micro-blogging on Twitter and the Google YouTube posting on his Blog, the national security community has some early warning on things we should be thinking through.

My recommendation:  If you haven’t done so already… sign up for Twitter.  If you’d like to see some good feeds to follow start here.

  • http://www.intelfusion.net Jeffrey

    Bob, thanks for the kind words about my post and for emphasizing the advantages inherent in Web 2.0 apps for National Security uses.
    Clearly I agree with you, and in fact your use case is reminiscent of the DARPA call that you and I briefly chatted about.

  • http://kevincurry.blogspot.com Kevin Curry

    Thank you for the post. Yes, Live Earth runs in a browser, as does Google Earth now, but both require an install and, as you probably know, that is the main barrier to entry; still requires heavy C&A across DoD and intel agencies before people will accept it. So, Microsoft really hasn't solved that problem. Also, trueSpace and Sketchup are both separate, installed apps so I don't really see a difference from an install perspective. Finally, unless something magic has happened, we can assume that all solutions cache data locally. While this may be optional, it usually hurts usability if not used. I point these out fully acknowledging that these are exciting and important steps in the right direction. I just happen to know the pain from experience. If I thought Live worked without an install I'd be dancing in the streets.
    Thank you for sharing your insights on these topics in this sector. It is needed.

  • http://kevincurry.blogspot.com Kevin Curry

    I re-read and read again…I think the important point you are trying to make is usability; less harsh context switch integrating into ubiquitously understood browser than (installing and) learning the nuances of a separate app. Am I back on track?

  • http://profile.typekey.com/ctovision/ Bob Gourley

    Kevin,
    Thanks for the comment. You did hit the important point, and raised several other good ones as well. I guess there are a couple "meta" points as well. For example, Google really disrupted things in a positive way when they bought Keyhole and deployed Google Earth, we all love that. But then things slowed a little. Now Microsoft (and many others) have been innovating and innovating and are deploying things that in many ways stand the chance of being even more disruptive (in a positive way). That will do a couple things, including enhancing support to national security, but it will also put more pressure back on Google to get them innovating again in this space.
    Anyway, thanks for reading and commenting.
    Bob

  • http://blogs.msdn.com/virtualearth Chris Pendleton

    Bob,
    While trueSpace remains a local client install, Virtual Earth can be installed behind the firewall – The Virtual Earth Appliance – http://blogs.msdn.com/virtualearth/archive/2008/0… This allows for a select area of data from Virtual Earth (road, sat/aerial and 3D) to be installed on a server accessible by applications without Internet connectivity. Additionally, I'm not sure the web is ready for browser-based 3D design software but perhaps a virtual centralized server install of trueSpace overcomes that issue altogether. Thanks for the read.
    CP

  • http://profile.typekey.com/ctovision/ Bob Gourley

    Chris,
    Thanks much for the comment and info. I just reviewed your blog and found it very informative. I'll be adding you to my blogroll so I remember to keep dropping by. I especially appreciated your post on MS SQL Server 2008. I should have anticipated MS would be adding more comprehensive spatial features there.
    Cheers,
    Bob

  • http://kevincurry.blogspot.com Kevin Curry

    Chris, do browser clients of the VE appliance still need a plugin installation? If so, is Microsoft working or have you obtained any C&A inside DoD?

  • http://blogs.msdn.com/virtualearth Chris Pendleton

    Kevin,
    Yes, the architecture for the 3D plugin remains the same with the appliance. We do have a Microsoft certification for Virtual Earth, but nothing yet inside of DoD.
    CP