<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A look ahead:  Some technology developments to expect in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/</link>
	<description>News, analysis and context on enterprise technology for the CTO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Interesting post </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Jack,  
I think all those challenges can be mitigated.  With capabilities like Presto security challenges in classified environments are mitigated because of strong governance of who can touch what services and because of tight connection to enterprise security mechanisms and directories.  
Endeca, from what I understand, usually does not have scaling problems, but unfortunately the government sometimes has program management problems.  The right design and right leadership is always required, with every technology.  
That is a very good point about the linking/viz apps market.   It is very wide.  I think I&#039;ll try to pull together an article on that.  
Cheers,  
Bob </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,<br />
I think all those challenges can be mitigated.  With capabilities like Presto security challenges in classified environments are mitigated because of strong governance of who can touch what services and because of tight connection to enterprise security mechanisms and directories.<br />
Endeca, from what I understand, usually does not have scaling problems, but unfortunately the government sometimes has program management problems.  The right design and right leadership is always required, with every technology.<br />
That is a very good point about the linking/viz apps market.   It is very wide.  I think I&#039;ll try to pull together an article on that.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack Israel</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>jack Israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Just a few thoughts.  
Mashups are cool, but they present a lot of security problems in classified environments.  
Endeca, which I saw earlier, continued to have scaling problems in A-Space.  
Linking/viz apps market is wide and hard to narrow down--Visual Analytics, I2, Saffron, Dulles Research, Palantir, Centrifuge, Penlink, Starlight, thick client vs. server-based.  Anybody have recommendations? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few thoughts.<br />
Mashups are cool, but they present a lot of security problems in classified environments.<br />
Endeca, which I saw earlier, continued to have scaling problems in A-Space.<br />
Linking/viz apps market is wide and hard to narrow down&#8211;Visual Analytics, I2, Saffron, Dulles Research, Palantir, Centrifuge, Penlink, Starlight, thick client vs. server-based.  Anybody have recommendations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Facebook connect is now up and running on my blog. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook connect is now up and running on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Bob - just checked out the new site - VERY nice. Looks very clean, very professional. Well done.  
Now you just have to keep writing :-) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; just checked out the new site &#8211; VERY nice. Looks very clean, very professional. Well done.<br />
Now you just have to keep writing <img src='http://ctovision.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTO Bob Gourley</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>CTO Bob Gourley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 06:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bob for that list.  Those all sound right on the mark.  Very good point about green losing some cachet.  As for economic recovery, oh boy I hope it is soon.  I wonder who to trust on that issue.  So many experts missed predicting the train wreck.  Some predicted it, but who knows if those folks were smart or lucky?  
Bob </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bob for that list.  Those all sound right on the mark.  Very good point about green losing some cachet.  As for economic recovery, oh boy I hope it is soon.  I wonder who to trust on that issue.  So many experts missed predicting the train wreck.  Some predicted it, but who knows if those folks were smart or lucky?<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Flores</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Flores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-216</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine sent me his composite of technology predictions he&#039;s found:  
More utility / cloud computing;  
ongoing refinement and expanded use of virtualization;  
more SaaS;  
ever-thinner desktops;  
more &#8220;netbooks;&#8221;  
even smarter smartphones;  
continued focus on green, but with some loss of cachet;  
more focus on data management;  
the ongoing maturation of SOA;  
more IT industry consolidation;  
more touch screens;  
improved search (with a semantic focus); and  
economic recovery that begins around October. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine sent me his composite of technology predictions he&#039;s found:<br />
More utility / cloud computing;<br />
ongoing refinement and expanded use of virtualization;<br />
more SaaS;<br />
ever-thinner desktops;<br />
more &ldquo;netbooks;&rdquo;<br />
even smarter smartphones;<br />
continued focus on green, but with some loss of cachet;<br />
more focus on data management;<br />
the ongoing maturation of SOA;<br />
more IT industry consolidation;<br />
more touch screens;<br />
improved search (with a semantic focus); and<br />
economic recovery that begins around October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTO Bob Gourley</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>CTO Bob Gourley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 03:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Dave, thanks for the note.  I agree with you about the pressures of falling budgets.  Mashups and open source are looking smarter and smarter. So is saving energy.  
Bob </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, thanks for the note.  I agree with you about the pressures of falling budgets.  Mashups and open source are looking smarter and smarter. So is saving energy.<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Fauth</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Fauth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Mashups/open source should be more prevalent especially with the anticipated funding reductions (less GWOT money).  
As the new IC metadata tagging/sharing standards are rolled out, any technology that can assist in that will be a big plus. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mashups/open source should be more prevalent especially with the anticipated funding reductions (less GWOT money).<br />
As the new IC metadata tagging/sharing standards are rolled out, any technology that can assist in that will be a big plus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mazzafroe</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/a-look-ahead-some-technology-developments-to-expect-in-2009/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Mazzafroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=5#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Happy New Year GourleySan!  I think this is help list because it connected to the present (i.e. I can extrapolate from things to today to what you say is coming) and at the same time thought provoking. 
As with most list like this though there are some inherent contradictions with the use of &quot;free software&quot; being my poster child here. 
Hard to argue that you can beat a better price than free, but I can certainly see issues here.  Linux is free, but Red Had build a significant along with Oracle in delivering it  -----  for a price! 
My real issue though with free software are things like governance, standards, and interoperability.  If the IC, or any other IT centric segment of the Federal Government can get its act together to mandate a spec list of free software and configurations for functionality then the benefits will be overwhelming, but I believe pigs will fly first and this certainly not achieveable in 2009/FY2010. 
To my point about contradiction:  You forcast (I believe correctly) that developing and deploying collaboration suite tools and apps will accelerate BUT to look for MICROSOFT, ADOBE, and CISCO to be key players.  Again I agree, but I don&#039;t associate any of these companies with free software. 
To close what I see happening is CIOs/CTO in the IC(only community I have competence to comment upon) having to measure against not so clear metrics of whether buying COTS out of the box enterprise suite solutions (based on open standards but bundled and tested for interoperability/collaboration by major Software Companies)or hirig integrators to build &quot;roll your own&quot; IT solutions leveraging free software.  Either way the software is not &quot; 
free&quot; 
As always Bob thanks an informative blog that makes me think more deeply about how the IC and the IT industry do and should intersect.     joemaz </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year GourleySan!  I think this is help list because it connected to the present (i.e. I can extrapolate from things to today to what you say is coming) and at the same time thought provoking.<br />
As with most list like this though there are some inherent contradictions with the use of &quot;free software&quot; being my poster child here.<br />
Hard to argue that you can beat a better price than free, but I can certainly see issues here.  Linux is free, but Red Had build a significant along with Oracle in delivering it  &#8212;&#8211;  for a price!<br />
My real issue though with free software are things like governance, standards, and interoperability.  If the IC, or any other IT centric segment of the Federal Government can get its act together to mandate a spec list of free software and configurations for functionality then the benefits will be overwhelming, but I believe pigs will fly first and this certainly not achieveable in 2009/FY2010.<br />
To my point about contradiction:  You forcast (I believe correctly) that developing and deploying collaboration suite tools and apps will accelerate BUT to look for MICROSOFT, ADOBE, and CISCO to be key players.  Again I agree, but I don&#039;t associate any of these companies with free software.<br />
To close what I see happening is CIOs/CTO in the IC(only community I have competence to comment upon) having to measure against not so clear metrics of whether buying COTS out of the box enterprise suite solutions (based on open standards but bundled and tested for interoperability/collaboration by major Software Companies)or hirig integrators to build &quot;roll your own&quot; IT solutions leveraging free software.  Either way the software is not &quot;<br />
free&quot;<br />
As always Bob thanks an informative blog that makes me think more deeply about how the IC and the IT industry do and should intersect.     joemaz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

