<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media and the National Security Professional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/</link>
	<description>News, analysis and context on enterprise technology for the CTO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Engineering — Hacking by Asking &#171; Lamont Price&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Engineering — Hacking by Asking &#171; Lamont Price&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-251</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Media and the National Security Professional [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Media and the National Security Professional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Engineering — Hacking by Asking &#124; LaMont Price</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Engineering — Hacking by Asking &#124; LaMont Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-250</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Media and the National Security Professional [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Media and the National Security Professional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alabamajobs</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-4971</link>
		<dc:creator>alabamajobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-4971</guid>
		<description>Please visit our website there are many jobs available so what are you thinking just go through our website www.staffingpower.com find the job according to your profile.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please visit our website there are many jobs available so what are you thinking just go through our website <a href="http://www.staffingpower.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.staffingpower.com</a> find the job according to your profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alabamajobs</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>alabamajobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Please visit our website there are many jobs available so what are you thinking just go through our website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.staffingpower.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.staffingpower.com&lt;/a&gt;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.staffingpower.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.staffingpower.com&lt;/a&gt; find the job according to your profile.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please visit our website there are many jobs available so what are you thinking just go through our website <a href="http://www.staffingpower.com" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://www.staffingpower.com&lt;/a&gt;" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://www.staffingpower.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.staffingpower.com</a> find the job according to your profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alabamajobs</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>alabamajobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Please visit our website there are many jobs available so what are you thinking just go through our website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.staffingpower.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.staffingpower.com&lt;/a&gt;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.staffingpower.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.staffingpower.com&lt;/a&gt; find the job according to your profile.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please visit our website there are many jobs available so what are you thinking just go through our website <a href="http://www.staffingpower.com" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://www.staffingpower.com&lt;/a&gt;" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://www.staffingpower.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.staffingpower.com</a> find the job according to your profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Avery</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-4949</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-4949</guid>
		<description>One thing to be careful with anytime one is discussing social media is for personal safety related to your position - how much personal info you put out there and how much of a threat that generates for yourself and your family. 

Always think first before putting any personal info out there - we&#039;re definitely in an era of information sharing, but don&#039;t go overboard!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to be careful with anytime one is discussing social media is for personal safety related to your position &#8211; how much personal info you put out there and how much of a threat that generates for yourself and your family. </p>
<p>Always think first before putting any personal info out there &#8211; we&#8217;re definitely in an era of information sharing, but don&#8217;t go overboard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Avery</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-247</guid>
		<description>One thing to be careful with anytime one is discussing social media is for personal safety related to your position - how much personal info you put out there and how much of a threat that generates for yourself and your family. Always think first before putting any personal info out there - we&#039;re definitely in an era of information sharing, but don&#039;t go overboard! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to be careful with anytime one is discussing social media is for personal safety related to your position &#8211; how much personal info you put out there and how much of a threat that generates for yourself and your family. Always think first before putting any personal info out there &#8211; we&#039;re definitely in an era of information sharing, but don&#039;t go overboard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media and Web2.0 for National Security Planners &#124; CTOvision.com</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media and Web2.0 for National Security Planners &#124; CTOvision.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-246</guid>
		<description>[...] The current draft of the article is at:  http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/ [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The current draft of the article is at:  <a href="http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/" rel="nofollow">http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Gourley</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Gourley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Joel I sure am glad to have made your online acquaintance and appreciate the thoughts on all these issues.  
 
These are some interesting quandaries regarding protocol.  I&#039;m not sure I have the answer, but have observed similar things and I know these are topics we have to think through.  Maybe the standard should be that 100% of a command is expected to &quot;friend&quot; each other.   Or maybe there is some updated version of &quot;Calls,&quot; a practice captured on page 102 of the Naval Officer&#039;s Guide.  This was the practice of junior officers and their spouses paying formal at-home calls on the CO and other officers of the command.  After the &quot;Call&quot;, the JO leaves a calling card (not business card).  Those &quot;Calls&quot; were expected to be returned within two weeks.  Maybe the online version is the junior is expected to &quot;friend&quot; all others in the command and all others will friend back within two hours.  
  
That type of approach might generate more value for commands since it will create more of a critical mass.  
 
Cheers,  
Bob </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel I sure am glad to have made your online acquaintance and appreciate the thoughts on all these issues.  </p>
<p>These are some interesting quandaries regarding protocol.  I&#039;m not sure I have the answer, but have observed similar things and I know these are topics we have to think through.  Maybe the standard should be that 100% of a command is expected to &quot;friend&quot; each other.   Or maybe there is some updated version of &quot;Calls,&quot; a practice captured on page 102 of the Naval Officer&#039;s Guide.  This was the practice of junior officers and their spouses paying formal at-home calls on the CO and other officers of the command.  After the &quot;Call&quot;, the JO leaves a calling card (not business card).  Those &quot;Calls&quot; were expected to be returned within two weeks.  Maybe the online version is the junior is expected to &quot;friend&quot; all others in the command and all others will friend back within two hours.  </p>
<p>That type of approach might generate more value for commands since it will create more of a critical mass.  </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Rothschild</title>
		<link>http://ctovision.com/2009/01/social-media-and-the-national-security-professional/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Rothschild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctovision.com/?p=118#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Bob, 
 
By now, you are probably regretting that you ever responded to my e-mail about the challenges of getting National Security Professionals to make better use of social networking tools. 
 
I wear many hats, and one of them is military.  Recently, I have had to the time to start pushing social media tools as a way of interacting with the Navy&#039;s Information Professional community.  But almost immediately, some quandaries have come up.  First and foremost: protocol. 
 
How do you set the ground rules for &quot;friending&quot; subordinates or superiors?  If a senior officer &quot;friends&quot; a junior officer (JO), the JO might feel compelled to accept the offer.  Likewise, there might be a perception that JOs trying to friend a senior officer are &quot;sucking up.&quot; 
 
I have tried to set the ground rules by stating that there are no expectations either way and that this was all voluntary.  But I&#039;m not sure everyone believes it at face value.   
 
What are your thoughts?  How do we get honest and face-value out of these tools? 
 
//Joel </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, </p>
<p>By now, you are probably regretting that you ever responded to my e-mail about the challenges of getting National Security Professionals to make better use of social networking tools. </p>
<p>I wear many hats, and one of them is military.  Recently, I have had to the time to start pushing social media tools as a way of interacting with the Navy&#039;s Information Professional community.  But almost immediately, some quandaries have come up.  First and foremost: protocol. </p>
<p>How do you set the ground rules for &quot;friending&quot; subordinates or superiors?  If a senior officer &quot;friends&quot; a junior officer (JO), the JO might feel compelled to accept the offer.  Likewise, there might be a perception that JOs trying to friend a senior officer are &quot;sucking up.&quot; </p>
<p>I have tried to set the ground rules by stating that there are no expectations either way and that this was all voluntary.  But I&#039;m not sure everyone believes it at face value.   </p>
<p>What are your thoughts?  How do we get honest and face-value out of these tools? </p>
<p>//Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

