Comments on: May I have your views on the future of IT? http://ctovision.com/2009/04/may-i-have-your-views-on-the-future-of-it/ News, analysis and context on enterprise technology for the CTO Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:01:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bob Gourley http://ctovision.com/2009/04/may-i-have-your-views-on-the-future-of-it/#comment-290 Bob Gourley Fri, 01 May 2009 11:01:48 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=141#comment-290 Eric, Thanks much for all those comments, I really appreciate them. I especially like the point about sorting company names by market cap. You are so right about that. Bob Eric,

Thanks much for all those comments, I really appreciate them. I especially like the point about sorting company names by market cap. You are so right about that.

Bob

]]> By: Eric http://ctovision.com/2009/04/may-i-have-your-views-on-the-future-of-it/#comment-289 Eric Fri, 01 May 2009 09:08:05 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=141#comment-289 ppt 23 `Rise WEB 2.0` `All the big IT firms are moving into the Web2.0 world, including: why the given order, it appears random ?! *idea* sort order by Market Cap BN[implies R+D budget, market longevity/endurance] Microsoft 177 IBM 137 CISCO 112 Oracle 96 HP 86 EMC 24 Adobe 14 SUN 3 ppt 23 `Rise WEB 2.0`
`All the big IT firms are moving into the Web2.0 world, including: why the given order, it appears random ?!
*idea* sort order by Market Cap BN[implies R+D budget, market longevity/endurance]
Microsoft 177
IBM 137
CISCO 112
Oracle 96
HP 86
EMC 24
Adobe 14
SUN 3

]]> By: Eric http://ctovision.com/2009/04/may-i-have-your-views-on-the-future-of-it/#comment-288 Eric Fri, 01 May 2009 06:47:06 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=141#comment-288 Dear Bob, Thank you kindly for your guidance and insight. A few questions/ideas regarding your slides: a) ppt 15 Why the term `Accelerate`, what is benefit +or virtue of acceleration on Next-Generation Platforms. Perhaps you mean evolving with today`s science in academia+industry as market changes from season-to-season. Here in US, every 18months seems to ushers a -new dawn- of ~creative destruction~. Perhaps your meaning on this slide it that TODAYS Changes are epoch in scale and transformational from NATION vs NATION, as currencies-economies-technology innovation collides in globalization. b) ppt 5 *idea* `Part One` Epoch Change [NATIONAL CONSEQUENCES] c) ppt 11, `High Risk DB Vulnerabilities over last 3 years` ... what is source, context of these statistics, esp. Oracle DB Stats. d) ppt 18, *idea* Data Mining -> Predictive Technologies [ie. exponential curve of data-growth+storage, predictive technologies will mature and increasingly model probability patterns. e) ppt 23 *idea* MindMap of WEB 2.0 to include `REFLEXIVITY` [Theory of Human innate human-err, populations make mistakes, online expression has -some quotient of err- ... beware] f) ppt 24, 4th bullet, predictive g) ppt 25, `270 TB of NTM `daily` ?! Dear Bob,
Thank you kindly for your guidance and insight. A few questions/ideas regarding your slides:
a) ppt 15 Why the term `Accelerate`, what is benefit +or virtue of acceleration on Next-Generation Platforms. Perhaps you mean evolving with today`s science in academia+industry as market changes from season-to-season. Here in US, every 18months seems to ushers a -new dawn- of ~creative destruction~. Perhaps your meaning on this slide it that TODAYS Changes are epoch in scale and transformational from NATION vs NATION, as currencies-economies-technology innovation collides in globalization.
b) ppt 5 *idea* `Part One` Epoch Change [NATIONAL CONSEQUENCES]
c) ppt 11, `High Risk DB Vulnerabilities over last 3 years` … what is source, context of these statistics, esp. Oracle DB Stats.
d) ppt 18, *idea* Data Mining -> Predictive Technologies [ie. exponential curve of data-growth+storage, predictive technologies will mature and increasingly model probability patterns.
e) ppt 23 *idea* MindMap of WEB 2.0 to include `REFLEXIVITY` [Theory of Human innate human-err, populations make mistakes, online expression has -some quotient of err- ... beware]
f) ppt 24, 4th bullet, predictive
g) ppt 25, `270 TB of NTM `daily` ?!

]]> By: Bob Gourley http://ctovision.com/2009/04/may-i-have-your-views-on-the-future-of-it/#comment-287 Bob Gourley Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:38:53 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=141#comment-287 Brian, I'm sorry, that link was broken in my recent migration. I've fixed that now. Thanks for pointing that out. Bob Brian,

I'm sorry, that link was broken in my recent migration. I've fixed that now.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Bob

]]> By: BrianWeyrauch http://ctovision.com/2009/04/may-i-have-your-views-on-the-future-of-it/#comment-286 BrianWeyrauch Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:12:33 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=141#comment-286 When I click on the link 090413_The_Future_of_IT.pdf my browser is redirected to the main page with a "nothing found" message. Can you help me out with that? Thanks! When I click on the link 090413_The_Future_of_IT.pdf my browser is redirected to the main page with a "nothing found" message. Can you help me out with that? Thanks!

]]> By: Bob http://ctovision.com/2009/04/may-i-have-your-views-on-the-future-of-it/#comment-285 Bob Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:24:56 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=141#comment-285 Joemaz- thanks for the comments. I pushed back a little bit on your open source comments in another post (at <a href="http://www.ctovision.com/2009/04/the-number-one-reason-to-move-to-open-source-security.html)" rel="nofollow">http://www.ctovision.com/2009/04/the-number-one-r...</a> But here you phrased things slightly differently and we can probably use this as a reason to clarify things. I never tried to define open. I expressed a definition of open source software, not all things "open". You can have an open management style, an open door policy, an open architecture, and open API's, and all those are good. And all those start with the same great mindset of open source software. But open source software is something that comes with an open source software license approved by the open source initiative (OSI). Open source software is about peer review and transparency. So if you have company folks who say open standards and open source are the same, please point them to opensource.org. Anyway, I agree with you regarding security. This stuff is more secure. And I strongly agree that commercially supported open source software is generally the better way to go. Cheers, Bob Joemaz- thanks for the comments. I pushed back a little bit on your open source comments in another post (at http://www.ctovision.com/2009/04/the-number-one-r…
But here you phrased things slightly differently and we can probably use this as a reason to clarify things. I never tried to define open. I expressed a definition of open source software, not all things "open". You can have an open management style, an open door policy, an open architecture, and open API's, and all those are good. And all those start with the same great mindset of open source software. But open source software is something that comes with an open source software license approved by the open source initiative (OSI). Open source software is about peer review and transparency. So if you have company folks who say open standards and open source are the same, please point them to opensource.org.
Anyway, I agree with you regarding security. This stuff is more secure. And I strongly agree that commercially supported open source software is generally the better way to go.
Cheers,
Bob

]]> By: Joseph M. Mazzafro http://ctovision.com/2009/04/may-i-have-your-views-on-the-future-of-it/#comment-284 Joseph M. Mazzafro Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:52:37 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=141#comment-284 Mazzafro's Law: All Bandwidth will be used Bob, presentation hits my two mega trends: data convergence and cloud computing. This drives two impacts: (1) governance and management of IT, and (2) data center consolidation. I believe your view on open software is far to binary. First your slides are miss leading in that don't tell us about the security vulnerabilities of Windows and Oracle DB compared to their deployment. Then some would disagree with your definition of open. Oracle says its DB SW is open as in it will work with all other "open standards" software. I'll just skip over the infra-structure advantages of commercial open source software like MS and Oracle sell and go right to security. I get that openness leads to better security over time as the user community will find and fix defects (though if you want Linux patches immediately you might want to consider Oracle Unbreakable Linux), but what about the adversary who develops maleware from the open environment and keeps in the "war reserve mode (warm)" until it wants an effect? To summarize I am not are arguing agains open source SW as you define it, but suggesting there are places and uses where open source makes sense and others (far more in the IC) were commerically open SW is the better approach joemaz Mazzafro's Law: All Bandwidth will be used
Bob, presentation hits my two mega trends: data convergence and cloud computing. This drives two impacts: (1) governance and management of IT, and (2) data center consolidation.
I believe your view on open software is far to binary. First your slides are miss leading in that don't tell us about the security vulnerabilities of Windows and Oracle DB compared to their deployment. Then some would disagree with your definition of open. Oracle says its DB SW is open as in it will work with all other "open standards" software. I'll just skip over the infra-structure advantages of commercial open source software like MS and Oracle sell and go right to security. I get that openness leads to better security over time as the user community will find and fix defects (though if you want Linux patches immediately you might want to consider Oracle Unbreakable Linux), but what about the adversary who develops maleware from the open environment and keeps in the "war reserve mode (warm)" until it wants an effect? To summarize I am not are arguing agains open source SW as you define it, but suggesting there are places and uses where open source makes sense and others (far more in the IC) were commerically open SW is the better approach
joemaz

]]> By: Bob Gourley http://ctovision.com/2009/04/may-i-have-your-views-on-the-future-of-it/#comment-283 Bob Gourley Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:08:57 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=141#comment-283 The first version of this had permissions set wrong on the embedded slide deck. Sorry about that! The first version of this had permissions set wrong on the embedded slide deck. Sorry about that!

]]>