Comments on: Towards a Cyber Deterrent: Are we getting any closer? http://ctovision.com/2009/11/towards-a-cyber-deterrent-are-we-getting-any-closer/ News, analysis and context on enterprise technology for the CTO Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:01:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: david ronfeldt http://ctovision.com/2009/11/towards-a-cyber-deterrent-are-we-getting-any-closer/#comment-4953 david ronfeldt Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:49:00 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=1330#comment-4953 tim steven's ubiwar blog led me here. what i was hoping for was moroe clarification about how best to organize, formally and informally, for cyber defense. your paper makes passing reference to assembling efforts by "a broad swath of experts in industry, academia and government" and from "Cross-functional, cross-discipline, public and private intellectual work". but otherwise this organizational design aspect is unclear. i don't have the answer, but i tried to offer some points here, for what they're worth: http://twotheories.blogspot.com/2009/07/toward-collaborative-community-for.html a main point is that the overall design should include a lot more than just key government and big industry actors. tim steven’s ubiwar blog led me here. what i was hoping for was moroe clarification about how best to organize, formally and informally, for cyber defense. your paper makes passing reference to assembling efforts by “a broad swath of experts in industry, academia and government” and from “Cross-functional, cross-discipline, public and private intellectual work”. but otherwise this organizational design aspect is unclear. i don’t have the answer, but i tried to offer some points here, for what they’re worth:

http://twotheories.blogspot.com/2009/07/toward-collaborative-community-for.html

a main point is that the overall design should include a lot more than just key government and big industry actors.

]]> By: david ronfeldt http://ctovision.com/2009/11/towards-a-cyber-deterrent-are-we-getting-any-closer/#comment-455 david ronfeldt Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:49:49 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=1330#comment-455 tim steven's ubiwar blog led me here. what i was hoping for was moroe clarification about how best to organize, formally and informally, for cyber defense. your paper makes passing reference to assembling efforts by "a broad swath of experts in industry, academia and government" and from "Cross-functional, cross-discipline, public and private intellectual work". but otherwise this organizational design aspect is unclear. i don't have the answer, but i tried to offer some points here, for what they're worth:<a href="http://twotheories.blogspot.com/2009/07/toward-collaborative-community-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://twotheories.blogspot.com/2009/07/toward-.....</a>a main point is that the overall design should include a lot more than just key government and big industry actors. tim steven's ubiwar blog led me here. what i was hoping for was moroe clarification about how best to organize, formally and informally, for cyber defense. your paper makes passing reference to assembling efforts by "a broad swath of experts in industry, academia and government" and from "Cross-functional, cross-discipline, public and private intellectual work". but otherwise this organizational design aspect is unclear. i don't have the answer, but i tried to offer some points here, for what they're worth:http://twotheories.blogspot.com/2009/07/toward-…..a main point is that the overall design should include a lot more than just key government and big industry actors.

]]> By: david ronfeldt http://ctovision.com/2009/11/towards-a-cyber-deterrent-are-we-getting-any-closer/#comment-454 david ronfeldt Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:49:49 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=1330#comment-454 tim steven's ubiwar blog led me here. what i was hoping for was moroe clarification about how best to organize, formally and informally, for cyber defense. your paper makes passing reference to assembling efforts by "a broad swath of experts in industry, academia and government" and from "Cross-functional, cross-discipline, public and private intellectual work". but otherwise this organizational design aspect is unclear. i don't have the answer, but i tried to offer some points here, for what they're worth:<a href="http://twotheories.blogspot.com/2009/07/toward-collaborative-community-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://twotheories.blogspot.com/2009/07/toward-.....</a>a main point is that the overall design should include a lot more than just key government and big industry actors. tim steven's ubiwar blog led me here. what i was hoping for was moroe clarification about how best to organize, formally and informally, for cyber defense. your paper makes passing reference to assembling efforts by "a broad swath of experts in industry, academia and government" and from "Cross-functional, cross-discipline, public and private intellectual work". but otherwise this organizational design aspect is unclear. i don't have the answer, but i tried to offer some points here, for what they're worth:http://twotheories.blogspot.com/2009/07/toward-…..a main point is that the overall design should include a lot more than just key government and big industry actors.

]]> By: Burying Nitze | Haft of the Spear http://ctovision.com/2009/11/towards-a-cyber-deterrent-are-we-getting-any-closer/#comment-453 Burying Nitze | Haft of the Spear Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:45:34 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=1330#comment-453 [...] old friend and colleague Bob Gourley asks if we are any closer to achieving a cyber deterrence policy. I say: stop burning CPU cycles focusing on a narrow set of legacy futures or start developing new [...] [...] old friend and colleague Bob Gourley asks if we are any closer to achieving a cyber deterrence policy. I say: stop burning CPU cycles focusing on a narrow set of legacy futures or start developing new [...]

]]> By: Bob Gourley http://ctovision.com/2009/11/towards-a-cyber-deterrent-are-we-getting-any-closer/#comment-4947 Bob Gourley Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:14:00 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=1330#comment-4947 Thanks Dunsany for the link. I tend to agree that the counter intel model has been undersupported and I appreciate your comment and the brief at the link. Thanks! Thanks Dunsany for the link. I tend to agree that the counter intel model has been undersupported and I appreciate your comment and the brief at the link. Thanks!

]]> By: Anonymous http://ctovision.com/2009/11/towards-a-cyber-deterrent-are-we-getting-any-closer/#comment-4946 Anonymous Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:03:00 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=1330#comment-4946 I feel the answer lies in a different direction for cyber-deterrence - more of a counter-intelligence model. http://www.iedtalk.com/2009/07/slides-and-notes.html I feel the answer lies in a different direction for cyber-deterrence – more of a counter-intelligence model. http://www.iedtalk.com/2009/07/slides-and-notes.html

]]> By: ctovision http://ctovision.com/2009/11/towards-a-cyber-deterrent-are-we-getting-any-closer/#comment-452 ctovision Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:14:47 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=1330#comment-452 Thanks Dunsany for the link. I tend to agree that the counter intel model has been undersupported and I appreciate your comment and the brief at the link. Thanks! Thanks Dunsany for the link. I tend to agree that the counter intel model has been undersupported and I appreciate your comment and the brief at the link. Thanks!

]]> By: dunsany http://ctovision.com/2009/11/towards-a-cyber-deterrent-are-we-getting-any-closer/#comment-451 dunsany Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:03:47 +0000 http://ctovision.com/?p=1330#comment-451 I feel the answer lies in a different direction for cyber-deterrence - more of a counter-intelligence model. <a href="http://www.iedtalk.com/2009/07/slides-and-notes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.iedtalk.com/2009/07/slides-and-notes.....</a> I feel the answer lies in a different direction for cyber-deterrence – more of a counter-intelligence model. http://www.iedtalk.com/2009/07/slides-and-notes…..

]]>