I recently joined 200 other DoD and Industry big data experts in Charleston, South Carolina at the AFCEA Big Data in the Maritime Battlespace Symposium as we wrestled with how to manage big data in a maritime battlespace environment. As hard as that is with plenty of bandwidth, storage and computing power, the problem becomes infinitely more difficult in the disconnected, intermittent, low bandwidth world of ships at sea. This AFCEA Low Country chapter event was aimed at connecting the government and industry strategists and technicians so they could tackle some of these issues.
One of the more interesting discussions revolved around the idea that before you could begin to assemble the technologies and procedures to analyze the data, you needed to determine exactly who was the consumer and who was the producer. In a Battlespace environment, those roles can change very quickly. Lt Rollie Wicks from the Naval Postgraduate School shared his research on the Naval Tactical Cloud. The overview he presented was a thoughtful analysis of the issues and options available and carefully reviewed the issues between the types of clouds and their tactical uses.
As Navy sensors evolve and more unmanned vehicles dump valuable data into the battle group, we can expect they will create 100 terabytes per day in the next few years. Navy needs big data cloud technologies to provide capability, agility and keep down life cycle costs. In the next few years, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) will be conducting a series of Limited Technology Experiments (LTE’s) to explore how a tactical cloud might support (or impair) data processing at sea. Issues to be resolved will be security of the information, how to make sure the information is available even when the clouds are not, and how well proven big data, cloud solutions will work in the limited bandwidth environments. Most of the government speakers expressed some form of concern that the new technologies are ahead of their existing architectures. Being able to identify that early on is essential to success.
One of the more interesting displays was by Terracotta, who demonstrated their in-memory solution featuring complex event processing on streaming bigdata. In the next few years, these types of cutting edge capabilities will be necessary to manage the above mentioned data deluges.
One of the more interesting discussions was by Chris Biow, public sector CTO for MarkLogic, who always provides fantastic context on modern analytical tools. Chris added valuable insights into providing analytical tools and decision support methods that work in a bandwidth constrained environment
Speaker list included:
- Tony Orlando – AFCEA President
- Captain Glover – CO SSC LANT
- Marv Langston, Langston Associates
- Terry Simpson, HQ USMC
- Dr. Howard , DISA
- Chuck Gassert, DCGS N
- LCDR Jeff Kenney, NCWDG
- Sandra L. Smith, USMC
- Brian Freeman, MITRE
- Tom Plunkett, ORACLE
- Kirk Kern, NATAPP
- Shaun Connolly, Horton Works
- Basil Decina, NRL
- John Easton, METOC
- Michele Weslander Quaid, GOOGLE
- Jim Wakefield, Teradata
- Fabien Sanglier, Terracotta
- Rich Campbell, EMC
- Ted Malone, Microsoft
- Chris Blow, Mark Logic
- Mike MacDonald,OPNAV/TENCAP
- LCDR Jeff Kinney, NCWDG
Related Posts:
Navy’s Elite Super IT Team: There are lessons here for IT in any complex global enterprise
Do You Seek To Support DoD? Selling your Requirements – in a fiscally constrained year
The Industry Partners of DoD Need Info On Future Requirements, but the Silence is Deafening
DARPA’S Cyber Tools: We have had our hands on DARPA’s distribution platform for cyber defense tools
Selling to Government (Especially DoD) – It’s not all about YOU!
